Re: Endorsement of “Dear Appropriator” Letters for FY18 Library Funding
May 17, 2017
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
The undersigned companies are the charter members of the Corporate Committee for Library Investment (CCLI), which we have organized to support federal library funding and whose membership we are working to significantly expand. We do business in every state in the nation, collectively generating several billion dollars in annual revenue, employing thousands of people and financially enabling scores of other businesses in our supply and service chains to hire thousands more. Many of us serve a very special set of customers at the core of nearly every community in the country who themselves annually spend more than $8 billion on goods and services provided by thousands of businesses. Those customers are America’s libraries.
As the FY 2018 appropriations cycle begins, we write to ask you to join us in supporting libraries – and thus America’s economy – by signing both of the attached “Dear Appropriator” letters urging full funding for two modest but essential library programs: the Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) at $186.6 million and Innovative Approaches to Literacy (IAL) at $27 million. LSTA funding goes almost entirely to a population-based matching grant program that puts states in charge of how funds are spent. IAL allows school libraries to buy books and educational materials for the nation’s neediest children. We make this request not solely because library purchases are important to our bottom lines, but for at least three additional important economic reasons:
Libraries build strong workforces and strong economies in communities of every size in every state in the nation. For example, an FY 2017 study in Texas just documented an “ROI” of $4.64 for every dollar the state invested in public libraries, and that result is not anomalous;
State libraries dramatically leverage taxpayer dollars by using LSTA funds to purchase or contract for electronic materials that they make available to every individual library in their states, thus realizing enormous efficiencies and economies of scale. Consequently, every library user enjoys access to authoritative information that would cost many fold more or simply be unavailable due to cost factors if otherwise had to be purchased by individual libraries, schools and universities; and
Public universities garner billions in private industry grants for R & D research to which such LSTA-funded electronic online resources are vital. Those grants, in turn, offset taxpayer-funded education costs and contribute substantially to keeping American companies competitive.
By these measures, CCLI respectfully submits that library funding may be among the very best yielding and most leverageable investment that Congress makes across the entire federal budget. Libraries are thus very much critical national infrastructure: ubiquitous, indispensable, and economically essential. Consider:
There are 25% more public libraries in the United States than Starbucks;
Each year, America’s more than 120,000 libraries of all kinds are visited 1.4 billion times nationwide (averaging to about 4 million visits per day or 2,663 visits per minute);
Those many millions of visitors come to modern libraries to borrow books, but also because libraries do (and have for decades been doing) so much more:
100% of libraries offer free access to the internet;
97% help patrons, including particularly veterans, complete government forms online;
90% train children and adults in computer literacy and other online skills;
73% aid patrons with job applications and interviewing skills;
68% help users use databases to find job openings; and
48% provide entrepreneurs and small business owners with online resources.
The bottom line, literally and figuratively, is that the health of our businesses, our workers and all of our communities is inextricably linked to the health of libraries and their continued federal funding. Accordingly, we urge you to:
Sign both of the attached bipartisan letters to your colleagues on the Appropriations Committee (circulated for LSTA by Sens. Reed and Collins and for IAL by Sens. Reed, Grassley and Stabenow) asking them to fully fund for FY 2018 the Library Services and Technology Act at $186.6 million and the tiny but vital Innovative Approaches to Literacy program at $27 million; and
Ensure sufficient funding for the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which has efficiently administered the LSTA to bipartisan praise for many years.
Indications of intent to sign these letters have been requested by their authors by May 19. To support LSTA and IAL by signing them, or should you have any questions, please contact Elyse Wasch concerning LSTA at firstname.lastname@example.org and Moira Lenehan regarding IAL at email@example.com. Thank you for supporting America’s businesses by supporting America’s libraries.
Albert Whitman & Company
Blackstone Audio, Inc.
Bloomsbury Children's Books
Books of Aurora, Inc.
Boydell & Brewer, Inc
Boyds Mills Press
Cohen Strategy Group, LLC
Continental Sales Inc.
Free Spirit Publishing
Gallopade International, Inc
Independent Publishers Group
Information Library & Information Solutions
Knapp Made Products Inc
Lee & Low Books
Lerner Publishing Group
Library Resource Management Systems, Inc
Media Source, Inc.
Mitchell Lane Publishers
Nancy Berland Public Relations, Inc
NBM Graphic Novels/Papercutz
Rowman & Littlefield
Society of Children's Book Writers and Illustrators
South Shore Computer Repair
Stanton Publication Services, Inc.
State Standards Publishing
Tanglewood Publishing, Inc.
The Child's World, Inc.
Who's On My WiFi
World Book, Inc.
 In 2010, Ohio realized a return of $3.89, and a 2009 survey of similar studies conducted in 10 states during the preceding 10 years showed an average ROI of $4.54 for every library dollar spent in several different environments (within 10 cents of the figure derived this year in Texas, above).
 There were 13,172 Starbucks in the U.S. in FY 2016 and 16,559 public library outlets in FY 2014, the last year for which such information was available.